User Tools

Site Tools


documents:answers:if_congress_refuses_call

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
documents:answers:if_congress_refuses_call [2015/11/01 02:23]
Oliver Wolcott ↷ Page moved from authoring:cospwiki:answers:if_congress_refuses_call to documents:answers:if_congress_refuses_call
documents:answers:if_congress_refuses_call [2015/12/25 03:14]
Oliver Wolcott
Line 4: Line 4:
 ======What If Congress Refuses to Call a Convention?​====== ======What If Congress Refuses to Call a Convention?​======
  
-[[http://​www.conventionofstates.com/​what_if_congress_refuses_to_call_a_convention|(source)]] ​+[[http://​www.conventionofstates.com/​what_if_congress_refuses_to_call_a_convention|(source)]] 
 +{{tag>​Propose Ratification Congress_control}} ​
  
 Some have suggested that Congress might simply refuse to call an Article V Convention of the States, even if it receives 34 applications from state legislatures for a convention. While we agree that Congress is generally disinclined to relinquish its own power (which is precisely why an Article V Convention is necessary), it is a settled matter of constitutional law that Congress must call the Convention upon receipt of the requisite 34 applications on the same subject matter. <​sup>​[[#​i|(1)]]</​sup>​ Some have suggested that Congress might simply refuse to call an Article V Convention of the States, even if it receives 34 applications from state legislatures for a convention. While we agree that Congress is generally disinclined to relinquish its own power (which is precisely why an Article V Convention is necessary), it is a settled matter of constitutional law that Congress must call the Convention upon receipt of the requisite 34 applications on the same subject matter. <​sup>​[[#​i|(1)]]</​sup>​
Line 30: Line 31:
 <​BOOKMARK:​ii>​ 2. Roberts v. United States, 176 U.S. 221, 230 (1900); see also Powell v. McCormick, 395 U.S. 486 (1969) (issuing a declaratory judgment to reinstate an improperly evicted member of Congress); Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958) (rejecting state'​s claim that its legislature and governor were not bound by a federal court'​s injunction). <​BOOKMARK:​ii>​ 2. Roberts v. United States, 176 U.S. 221, 230 (1900); see also Powell v. McCormick, 395 U.S. 486 (1969) (issuing a declaratory judgment to reinstate an improperly evicted member of Congress); Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958) (rejecting state'​s claim that its legislature and governor were not bound by a federal court'​s injunction).
  
-{{tag>​Propose Raftification Congress_control}}+
  
  
documents/answers/if_congress_refuses_call.txt · Last modified: 2020/02/19 02:26 by Oliver Wolcott