documents:answers:short_answers
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
documents:answers:short_answers [2015/10/31 22:23] – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation Oliver Wolcott | documents:answers:short_answers [2015/11/01 09:13] – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation Oliver Wolcott | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
=====6. Even if the states try to limit the scope of the Article V Convention to proposing amendments that limit federal power, can’t those with other intentions hijack the process? | =====6. Even if the states try to limit the scope of the Article V Convention to proposing amendments that limit federal power, can’t those with other intentions hijack the process? | ||
- | No. Please refer to the list of redundant protections on the process, above. There are many different groups working to achieve an Article V Convention to propose various types of amendments, and they have every right to seek to use this constitutional process. But groups seeking amendments for other purposes are not involved in our effort, because they know they cannot achieve their goals at a convention called pursuant to [[authoring:cospwiki: | + | No. Please refer to the list of redundant protections on the process, above. There are many different groups working to achieve an Article V Convention to propose various types of amendments, and they have every right to seek to use this constitutional process. But groups seeking amendments for other purposes are not involved in our effort, because they know they cannot achieve their goals at a convention called pursuant to [[documents:cosproject: |
=====7. What about the Congressional Research Service Report? | =====7. What about the Congressional Research Service Report? |
documents/answers/short_answers.txt · Last modified: 2022/01/01 13:22 by Oliver Wolcott