User Tools

Site Tools


documents:answers:two_reasons_one_state_vote

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
documents:answers:two_reasons_one_state_vote [2015/11/30 20:07] Oliver Wolcottdocuments:answers:two_reasons_one_state_vote [2016/06/07 00:02] Oliver Wolcott
Line 1: Line 1:
 <WRAP round download 60%> <WRAP round download 60%>
-{{:documents:answers:trying_to_abolish_the_convention_s_one-state-one-vote.pdf|PDF download}}+{{:documents:trying_to_abolish_the_convention_s_one-stateone-vote_rule_not_on.pdf|PDF download}}
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
 ======Trying to Abolish the Convention’s One-State/One-Vote Rule Not Only Would Be Unconstitutional—It Wouldn’t Be Worth Trying====== ======Trying to Abolish the Convention’s One-State/One-Vote Rule Not Only Would Be Unconstitutional—It Wouldn’t Be Worth Trying======
  
-February 6, 2015 by [[http://constitution.i2i.org/author/robnatelson/|Rob Natelson]] +February 6, 2015 by [[https://www.i2i.org/trying-to-abolishing-the-conventions-one-stateone-vote-rule-not-only-would-be-unconstitutional-it-wouldnt-be-worth-trying/|(Source)]] 
-[[http://constitution.i2i.org/2015/02/06/trying-to-abolishing-the-convention’s-one-stateone-vote-rule-not-only-would-be-unconstitutionalit-wouldn’t-be-worth-trying/|(Source)]] +{{tag>application amendments Natelson Necessary_and_Proper_clause Article_1_Section_8_Clause_18 One_vote Delegate who_dominates}}
-{{tag>application amendments Natelson Necessary_and_Proper_clause One_vote Delegate who_dominates}}+
      
  
documents/answers/two_reasons_one_state_vote.txt · Last modified: 2021/02/23 16:14 by 127.0.0.1