User Tools

Site Tools


documents:answers:two_reasons_one_state_vote

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
documents:answers:two_reasons_one_state_vote [2016/02/02 04:39]
Oliver Wolcott
documents:answers:two_reasons_one_state_vote [2016/06/07 04:02]
Oliver Wolcott
Line 1: Line 1:
 <WRAP round download 60%> <WRAP round download 60%>
-{{:​documents:answers:​trying_to_abolish_the_convention_s_one-state-one-vote.pdf|PDF download}}+{{:​documents:​trying_to_abolish_the_convention_s_one-stateone-vote_rule_not_on.pdf|PDF download}}
 </​WRAP>​ </​WRAP>​
  
 ======Trying to Abolish the Convention’s One-State/​One-Vote Rule Not Only Would Be Unconstitutional—It Wouldn’t Be Worth Trying====== ======Trying to Abolish the Convention’s One-State/​One-Vote Rule Not Only Would Be Unconstitutional—It Wouldn’t Be Worth Trying======
  
-February 6, 2015 by [[http://constitution.i2i.org/​author/​robnatelson/​|Rob Natelson]] +February 6, 2015 by [[https://www.i2i.org/​trying-to-abolishing-the-conventions-one-stateone-vote-rule-not-only-would-be-unconstitutional-it-wouldnt-be-worth-trying/​|(Source)]]
-[[http://​constitution.i2i.org/​2015/​02/​06/​trying-to-abolishing-the-convention’s-one-stateone-vote-rule-not-only-would-be-unconstitutionalit-wouldn’t-be-worth-trying/​|(Source)]]+
 {{tag>​application amendments Natelson Necessary_and_Proper_clause Article_1_Section_8_Clause_18 One_vote Delegate who_dominates}} {{tag>​application amendments Natelson Necessary_and_Proper_clause Article_1_Section_8_Clause_18 One_vote Delegate who_dominates}}
   ​   ​
documents/answers/two_reasons_one_state_vote.txt · Last modified: 2016/06/07 04:06 by Oliver Wolcott