User Tools

Site Tools


documents:cosproject:surge:article_10-finalconstitutionaloption

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
documents:cosproject:surge:article_10-finalconstitutionaloption [2018/03/25 12:13] Oliver Wolcottdocuments:cosproject:surge:article_10-finalconstitutionaloption [2018/03/26 10:27] Oliver Wolcott
Line 5: Line 5:
 {{tag>surge}} {{tag>surge}}
 {{:documents:cosproject:surge:article-10-top.png|The problem, which hardly needs stating, is that the federal government has become the very monster the Founders anticipated.}} {{:documents:cosproject:surge:article-10-top.png|The problem, which hardly needs stating, is that the federal government has become the very monster the Founders anticipated.}}
- 
 ---- ----
- 
-//The problem, which hardly needs stating, is that the federal government has become the very monster the Founders anticipated.// 
- 
----- 
- 
 ===== The Final Constitutional Option ===== ===== The Final Constitutional Option =====
 **Bob Berry** **Bob Berry**
Line 40: Line 34:
  
 {{:documents:cosproject:surge:article-10-center.png|The new reformers would do well to press on with the case for state-initiated amendments and ignore the tired conspiracy theories of the past.}} {{:documents:cosproject:surge:article-10-center.png|The new reformers would do well to press on with the case for state-initiated amendments and ignore the tired conspiracy theories of the past.}}
- 
 ---- ----
- 
-//The new reformers would do well to press on with the case for state-initiated amendments and ignore the tired conspiracy theories of the past.// 
- 
----- 
- 
- 
 In appeals to the public, the critics insidiously left out any mention of the ratification process by three-fourths of the states — the implication being that once the proceedings began, there would be nothing that could be done to hold it back when, inevitably, extreme elements moved to dissolve the Constitution. When challenged on this, the foes weaved the assertion into their conspiracy theory that the out-of-control assembly would simply declare its own sovereignty and dispense with the ratification process altogether! In appeals to the public, the critics insidiously left out any mention of the ratification process by three-fourths of the states — the implication being that once the proceedings began, there would be nothing that could be done to hold it back when, inevitably, extreme elements moved to dissolve the Constitution. When challenged on this, the foes weaved the assertion into their conspiracy theory that the out-of-control assembly would simply declare its own sovereignty and dispense with the ratification process altogether!
  
Line 79: Line 66:
  
 ---- ----
-Sign the COS Petition, be a leader https://conventionofstates.com/take_action \\ +{{page>:wiki_footer}}
-Volunteer here https://conventionofstates.com/take_action/volunteer +
- +
-||[[https://conventionofstates.com|{{ :cos-footer-logo.png |}}]] || +
-(540)441-7227 | [[https://conventionofstates.com|CONVENTIONOFSTATES.COM]] | [[https://facebook.com/conventionofstates|Facebook.com/ConventionOfStates]] | [[https://twitter.com/cosproject|Twitter.com/COSproject]]| [[info@conventionofstates.com| Email us]] +
- +
- +
- +
documents/cosproject/surge/article_10-finalconstitutionaloption.txt · Last modified: 2021/06/13 16:19 by Oliver Wolcott