User Tools

Site Tools


documents:cosproject:surge:article_13-fivemyths

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
documents:cosproject:surge:article_13-fivemyths [2018/03/25 12:20] Oliver Wolcottdocuments:cosproject:surge:article_13-fivemyths [2018/03/25 13:27] Oliver Wolcott
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 ---- ----
- 
-//Article V’s convention process is part of the beautiful constitutional machinery built to protect the states and the people from an overreaching federal government.// 
- 
----- 
- 
 ===== Five Myths About An Article V Convention ===== ===== Five Myths About An Article V Convention =====
 **Rita Dunaway, Esq., National Legislative Strategist for the Convention of States Project** **Rita Dunaway, Esq., National Legislative Strategist for the Convention of States Project**
Line 39: Line 34:
  
 ---- ----
- 
-//The process is so well-safeguarded that it has proven incredibly difficult to invoke.// 
- 
----- 
- 
 Moreover, this proposition makes no sense from a historical, practical or legal perspective. In every interstate convention ever held, there was //always// a specified topic or agenda for the meeting. Practically speaking, some limitation on the topic is necessary in order for the state legislatures to provide instructions to the delegates they send as their agents (states always instruct their delegates). Moreover, this proposition makes no sense from a historical, practical or legal perspective. In every interstate convention ever held, there was //always// a specified topic or agenda for the meeting. Practically speaking, some limitation on the topic is necessary in order for the state legislatures to provide instructions to the delegates they send as their agents (states always instruct their delegates).
  
documents/cosproject/surge/article_13-fivemyths.txt · Last modified: 2021/02/23 16:14 by 127.0.0.1