User Tools

Site Tools


documents:cosproject:surge:article_5-learnedmoreandmore

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
documents:cosproject:surge:article_5-learnedmoreandmore [2018/03/25 12:04] Oliver Wolcottdocuments:cosproject:surge:article_5-learnedmoreandmore [2018/03/26 10:24] Oliver Wolcott
Line 5: Line 5:
 {{tag>surge}} {{tag>surge}}
 {{:documents:cosproject:surge:surge-5-1.png?800|The mistakes these authors made can be attributed partly to the agenda-driven nature of their writings, and their failure to examine many historical sources.}} {{:documents:cosproject:surge:surge-5-1.png?800|The mistakes these authors made can be attributed partly to the agenda-driven nature of their writings, and their failure to examine many historical sources.}}
- 
 ---- ----
- 
-//The mistakes these authors made can be attributed partly to the agenda-driven nature of their writings, and their failure to examine many historical sources.// 
- 
----- 
- 
 ===== How We Have Learned More and More About the Constitution’s “Convention for Proposing Amendments” ===== ===== How We Have Learned More and More About the Constitution’s “Convention for Proposing Amendments” =====
 **Robert Natelson, Independence Institute’s Senior Fellow in Constitutional Jurisprudence and Head of the Institute’s Article V Information Center** **Robert Natelson, Independence Institute’s Senior Fellow in Constitutional Jurisprudence and Head of the Institute’s Article V Information Center**
Line 28: Line 22:
  
 {{:documents:cosproject:surge:surge-5-2.png?800|We have been able to place the Article V convention into its larger legal and historical context.}} {{:documents:cosproject:surge:surge-5-2.png?800|We have been able to place the Article V convention into its larger legal and historical context.}}
- 
 ---- ----
- 
-//We have been able to place the Article V convention into its larger legal and historical context.// 
- 
----- 
- 
- 
 Second Wave authors accessed far more material than their predecessors. They paid more attention to the 1787–90 ratification debates. Caplan even made some reference to earlier interstate conventions. Most of them (Paulsen was an exception) correctly concluded that an Article V gathering could be limited. Second Wave authors accessed far more material than their predecessors. They paid more attention to the 1787–90 ratification debates. Caplan even made some reference to earlier interstate conventions. Most of them (Paulsen was an exception) correctly concluded that an Article V gathering could be limited.
  
Line 51: Line 38:
  
 ---- ----
-Sign the COS Petition, be a leader https://conventionofstates.com/take_action \\ +{{page>:wiki_footer}}
-Volunteer here https://conventionofstates.com/take_action/volunteer +
- +
-||[[https://conventionofstates.com|{{ :cos-footer-logo.png |}}]] || +
-(540)441-7227 | [[https://conventionofstates.com|CONVENTIONOFSTATES.COM]] | [[https://facebook.com/conventionofstates|Facebook.com/ConventionOfStates]] | [[https://twitter.com/cosproject|Twitter.com/COSproject]]| [[info@conventionofstates.com| Email us]]+
  
  
  
  
documents/cosproject/surge/article_5-learnedmoreandmore.txt · Last modified: 2021/02/23 16:14 by 127.0.0.1