Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- documents:external:constitution_not_product_of_runaway_convention [2018/03/26 10:19] – Oliver Wolcott
+++ documents:external:constitution_not_product_of_runaway_convention [2022/01/01 11:49] (current) – Oliver Wolcott
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 DEFYING CONVENTIONAL WISDOM: THE CONSTITUTION WAS NOT THE PRODUCT OF A RUNAWAY CONVENTION
-[[http://www.harvard-jlpp.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Farris_FINAL.pdf|PDF Download,http://www.harvard-jlpp.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Farris_FINAL.pdf]]
+[[http://www.harvard-jlpp.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2017/03/Farris_FINAL.pdf|PDF Download,http://www.harvard-jlpp.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2017/03/Farris_FINAL.pdf]]
+/** old broken link per Rodney Huckleberry 11/14/19
+http://www.harvard-jlpp.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Farris_FINAL.pdf] **/
 </WRAP>
 ======= DEFYING CONVENTIONAL WISDOM: THE CONSTITUTION WAS NOT THE PRODUCT OF A RUNAWAY CONVENTION =======
-\\  {{tag>Runaway_Convention Ratification Congress_role}}
+\\  {{tag>runawayconvention Ratification Congress_role}}
@@ Line 573: / Line 576: @@
 As we can see, while Anti-Federalists had serious doubts about the propriety of the actions of the Convention's delegates, there was an overriding acknowledgement within their ranks of one key legal issue: the sources of the authority for the delegates were the enactments of each of the several state legislatures.
+(See also: [[historicaldocuments:founding:proceedings_annapolis_1787|Proceedings of the Annapolis Convention]] and [[historicaldocuments:founding:credentials|Credentials of the Delegates of 1787]])
 == b. Federalist Views ==