documents:answers:nullification-answered
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| authoring:cospwiki:cospdocuments:nullification-answered [2015/09/30 20:37] – Oliver Wolcott | authoring:cospwiki:cospdocuments:nullification-answered [2015/10/19 00:14] – Oliver Wolcott | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Is " | ====== Is " | ||
| + | {{tag> | ||
| Some conservative groups have argued that the Tenth Amendment allows an individual state to " | Some conservative groups have argued that the Tenth Amendment allows an individual state to " | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| ===== Footnote 1. ===== | ===== Footnote 1. ===== | ||
| - | The historical evidence supporting judicial review is overwhelming. Discussions during the Constitutional Convention indicate that James Madison, George Mason, Elbridge Gerry and numerous other delegates believed that the Supreme Court would be vested with the power of judicial review. In total, around 30 convention delegates are on the record as supporting judicial review and only 5 or so are on the record as opposing it. In Federalist | + | The historical evidence supporting judicial review is overwhelming. Discussions during the Constitutional Convention indicate that James Madison, George Mason, Elbridge Gerry and numerous other delegates believed that the Supreme Court would be vested with the power of judicial review. In total, around 30 convention delegates are on the record as supporting judicial review and only 5 or so are on the record as opposing it. In [[historicaldocuments: |
documents/answers/nullification-answered.txt · Last modified: 2021/02/23 16:14 by 127.0.0.1