Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- authoring:cospwiki:cospdocuments:nullification-answered [2015/10/04 17:09] – [Footnote 1.] Oliver Wolcott
+++ authoring:cospwiki:cospdocuments:nullification-answered [2015/10/04 17:10] – [Footnote 1.] Oliver Wolcott
@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 ===== Footnote 1. =====
-The historical evidence supporting judicial review is overwhelming. Discussions during the Constitutional Convention indicate that James Madison, George Mason, Elbridge Gerry and numerous other delegates believed that the Supreme Court would be vested with the power of judicial review. In total, around 30 convention delegates are on the record as supporting judicial review and only 5 or so are on the record as opposing it. In [[historicaldocuments:fedpapers:federalist78|FEDERALIST No. 78]]Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton discusses judicial review at length and firmly asserts that it is within the power of the federal judiciary.
+The historical evidence supporting judicial review is overwhelming. Discussions during the Constitutional Convention indicate that James Madison, George Mason, Elbridge Gerry and numerous other delegates believed that the Supreme Court would be vested with the power of judicial review. In total, around 30 convention delegates are on the record as supporting judicial review and only 5 or so are on the record as opposing it. In [[historicaldocuments:fedpapers:federalist78|FEDERALIST No. 78]], Alexander Hamilton discusses judicial review at length and firmly asserts that it is within the power of the federal judiciary.