User Tools

Site Tools


documents:cosproject:cos_handbook

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
documents:cosproject:cos_handbook [2015/12/17 19:48] – [Overview Of Prior American Experience With Conventions […]] Oliver Wolcottdocuments:cosproject:cos_handbook [2015/12/17 20:14] Oliver Wolcott
Line 1: Line 1:
 +<WRAP round download 60%>
 +[[https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/conventionofstates/pages/142/attachments/original/1416248525/COS_Handbook.pdf?1416248525|Download PDF]]
 +</WRAP>
 +
 ====== COS Handbook ====== ====== COS Handbook ======
 {{:documents:cosproject:cos-handbook-cover.png?nolink&400|}}\\  {{:documents:cosproject:cos-handbook-cover.png?nolink&400|}}\\ 
Line 6: Line 10:
  
 ----------------- -----------------
 +{{tag>amendments application delegates george_mason proposing ratification runaway_convention state_power}}
 +
 ===== Table of Contents ===== ===== Table of Contents =====
 **The Case for a Convention of States** **The Case for a Convention of States**
Line 426: Line 432:
  
 This record therefore suggests that a convention call, as the Constitution uses the term, may not include legally binding terms other than time, place, and subject. However, the occasional Founding-Era practice of making calls and applications conditional and of rescinding them suggests that Article V applications and calls also may be made conditional or rescinded. In accordance with Founding-Era practice, states are free to honor or reject calls, as they choose. This record therefore suggests that a convention call, as the Constitution uses the term, may not include legally binding terms other than time, place, and subject. However, the occasional Founding-Era practice of making calls and applications conditional and of rescinding them suggests that Article V applications and calls also may be made conditional or rescinded. In accordance with Founding-Era practice, states are free to honor or reject calls, as they choose.
 +
 +{{:documents:cosproject:history-multi-gov-convention-cos.png?nolink&600|}}
  
 Universal pre-constitutional practice tells us that states may select, commission, instruct, and pay their delegates as they wish, and may alter their instructions and recall them. Although the states may define the subject and instruct their commissioners to vote in a certain way, the convention as a whole makes its own rules, elects its own officers, establishes and staffs its own committees, and sets its own time of adjournment. Universal pre-constitutional practice tells us that states may select, commission, instruct, and pay their delegates as they wish, and may alter their instructions and recall them. Although the states may define the subject and instruct their commissioners to vote in a certain way, the convention as a whole makes its own rules, elects its own officers, establishes and staffs its own committees, and sets its own time of adjournment.
documents/cosproject/cos_handbook.txt · Last modified: 2022/01/01 11:53 by Oliver Wolcott