User Tools

Site Tools


documents:cosproject:surge:article_10-finalconstitutionaloption

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
documents:cosproject:surge:article_10-finalconstitutionaloption [2018/03/21 22:42] Oliver Wolcottdocuments:cosproject:surge:article_10-finalconstitutionaloption [2018/03/23 22:18] Oliver Wolcott
Line 55: Line 55:
 Before long, Natelson had acquired nearly all of the journals of founding-era conventions. This was added to his existing collection of material from each state’s ratification convention as each considered whether or not to approve the proposed 1787 Constitution. A picture of early American convention tradition began to emerge. Before long, Natelson had acquired nearly all of the journals of founding-era conventions. This was added to his existing collection of material from each state’s ratification convention as each considered whether or not to approve the proposed 1787 Constitution. A picture of early American convention tradition began to emerge.
  
-Casting a wider net, he pulled in over 40 generally neglected Article V court decisions, some of which had been argued before the Supreme Court. In a series of publications, Natelson churned out his findings (available at {{www.articlevinfocenter.com|www.articlevinfocenter.com}}), which surprised many — including himself.+Casting a wider net, he pulled in over 40 generally neglected Article V court decisions, some of which had been argued before the Supreme Court. In a series of publications, Natelson churned out his findings (available at [[http://www.articlevinfocenter.com|www.articlevinfocenter.com]]), which surprised many — including himself.
  
 The research quickly became the gold standard of scholarship about the process, known formally as the “State-Application-and-Convention” method of amending the Constitution. The research quickly became the gold standard of scholarship about the process, known formally as the “State-Application-and-Convention” method of amending the Constitution.
Line 69: Line 69:
 When a battle is won, it is wise to move to the next battle, for the waiting opponent is formidable and lives on Capitol Hill. When a battle is won, it is wise to move to the next battle, for the waiting opponent is formidable and lives on Capitol Hill.
  
-||{{:documents:cosproject:surge:cos-surege-logo.png?600 |}} || +---- 
-(540)441-7227 | [[https://conventionofstates.com|CONVENTIONOFSTATES.COM]] | [[https://facebook.com/conventionofstates|Facebook.com/ConventionOfStates]] | [[https://twitter.com/cosproject|Twitter.com/COSproject]] +Sign the COS Petition, be a leader https://conventionofstates.com/take_action \\ 
 +Volunteer here https://conventionofstates.com/take_action/volunteer 
 + 
 +||[[https://conventionofstates.com|{{ :cos-footer-logo.png |}}]] || 
 +(540)441-7227 | [[https://conventionofstates.com|CONVENTIONOFSTATES.COM]] | [[https://facebook.com/conventionofstates|Facebook.com/ConventionOfStates]] | [[https://twitter.com/cosproject|Twitter.com/COSproject]]| [[info@conventionofstates.com| Email us]]
  
  
  
  
documents/cosproject/surge/article_10-finalconstitutionaloption.txt · Last modified: 2021/06/13 16:19 by Oliver Wolcott