User Tools

Site Tools


documents:cosproject:surge:article_17-addressstatebudgetchallenges

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
documents:cosproject:surge:article_17-addressstatebudgetchallenges [2018/03/21 10:32] – File build by odt2dw plugin from fileArticle_17-AddressStateBudgetChallenges.odt Oliver Wolcottdocuments:cosproject:surge:article_17-addressstatebudgetchallenges [2018/03/25 11:05] Oliver Wolcott
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Article_17-AddressStateBudgetChallenges ====== +====== Article 17 Address State Budget Challenges ====== 
-<sub>{{Article_17-AddressStateBudgetChallenges.odt|Original file}}</sub>+<WRAP center round download 60%> 
 +[[https://conventionofstates.com/files/article-17-how-can-the-convention-of-states-project-help-address-my-state-s-budget-challenges|Download PDF, Article 17 - Address State Budget Challenges]] 
 +</WRAP> 
 +{{tag>surge}} 
 +{{:documents:cosproject:surge:article-17-1.png|Expenditures are easily hidden in the federal budget because it is so large and complicated.}}
  
-Expenditures are easily hidden in the federal budget because it is so large and complicated.+----
  
-**How Can the Convention of States Project Help Address My State’s Budget Challenges?**+//Expenditures are easily hidden in the federal budget because it is so large and complicated.//
  
 +----
 +
 +===== How Can the Convention of States Project Help Address My State’s Budget Challenges? =====
 **Vickie Deppe, Illinois Legislative Liaison, Convention of States Project** **Vickie Deppe, Illinois Legislative Liaison, Convention of States Project**
  
-Is your state a “donor state?” Donor states are those in which taxpayers con-sistently pay significantly more to the federal government in tax payments than their state receives in federal spend-ing. California, Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Min-nesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, and Ohio are consistently among the biggest losers when it comes to the federal budgeting process. All of these states each lost over <sup>$</sup>10 billion (some of+Is your state a “donor state?” Donor states are those in which taxpayers consistently pay significantly more to the federal government in tax payments than their state receives in federal spending. California, Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, and Ohio are consistently among the biggest losers when it comes to the federal budgeting process. All of these states each lost over <sup>$</sup>10 billion (some of them several times that) to other states in 2014 alone. Even tiny Delaware sent <sup>$</sup>13 billion to other states, courtesy of the federal government.
  
-them several times thatto other states in 2014 aloneEven tiny Delaware sent <sup>$</sup>13 billion to other statescourtesy of thefederal government.+Here in my home state of Illinois, our budget situation is so precarious that our comptroller made national news by suspending payments to lottery winnersIf we could keep even half of the <sup>$</sup>78 billion we lost in 2014 here in Illinoiswe could immediately close our budget gap and begin catching up on our under-funded pension obligations...without having to raise anyone’s taxes.
  
-Here in my home state of Illinois, our budget situation is so precarious that our comptroller made national news by suspending payments to lottery winnersIf we could keep even half of the <sup>$</sup>78 bil-lion we lost in 2014 here in Illinoiswe could immediately close our budget gap and begin catching up on our under-funded pension obligations...without having to raise anyone’s taxes.+How is this money collected, and where does it go? The money that goes to Washington gets there through a variety of taxes, some obvious and some less soPersonal income tax is one of the primary vehicles for the transfer of money from the states to Washington. Estate and inheritance taxes, gift taxes, and taxes, such as the FICA match, paid by employers are also part of the formulaMoney returns to the states through a wide array of federal programs and expenditures such as highway funding, social safety net programs, military spending...and pork.
  
-How is this money collected, and where does it go? The money that goes to Washington gets there through variety of taxessome obvious and some less so. Personal income tax is one of the pri-mary vehicles for the transfer of money from the states to Washington. Estate+Here are just few of the more egregious examples of federal waste, fraud, and abuse:
  
-and inheritance taxesgift taxes, and taxes, such as the FICA match, paid by employers are also part of the formula. Money returns to the states through a wide array of federal programs and expenditures such as highway fundingsocial safety net programsmilitary spending...and pork.+  * <sup>$</sup>150,000 to study the hookah smoking habits of Jordanian students 
 +  * <sup>$</sup>121 million on lavish conferences for Department of Justice employees 
 +  * <sup>$</sup>1 billion on energy credits for people who don’t own any real estate 
 +  * <sup>$</sup>24 million on routers powerful enough to serve thousands of users for buildings in rural West Virginia with fewer than 10 computers 
 +{{:documents:cosproject:surge:article-17-2.png|The needs of an individual communitybig or smallshouldn’t be drowned out in a one-size-fits-all “solution”.}}
  
-Here are just a few of the more egre-gious examples of federal waste, fraud, and abuse:+----
  
-  - <sup>$</sup>150,000 to study the hookah smokinghabits of Jordanian students +//The needs of an individual community, big or small, shouldn’t be drowned out in a one-size-fits-all “solution”.//
-  - <sup>$</sup>121 million on lavish conferences forDepartment of Justice employees +
-  - <sup>$</sup>1 billion on energy credits for peoplewho don’t own any real estate +
-  <sup>$</sup>24 million on routers powerfulenough to serve thousands of users +
-//Continued to back page//+
  
-The needs of an individual+----
  
-communitybig or small,+  * <sup>$</sup>104 million on a “Harbor to Nowhere”and “Airport to Nowhere” to go with Alaska’s “Bridge to Nowhere” 
 +  * <sup>$</sup>2 million to fund a single intern for the Department of Agriculture 
 +  * <sup>$</sup>862,000 a year to warehouse unused furniture for the IRS 
 +  * <sup>$</sup>16 million a year on food stamps for dead people 
 +These expenditures are easily hidden in the federal budget because it is so large and complicated. Together with the annotations, the federal budget is the size of a telephone directory for a large city. Unless they sit on an appropriations committee, members of Congress can only cast an up or down vote on a budget or spending bill in its entirety. Most of them can’t possibly read it all, and even if they did, they have no power to strike a single line item. And they certainly aren’t going to bring the entire federal government to a halt over a little pork...especially if their state benefits. But as Sen. Everett Dirksen famously said, “A billion here, a billion thereand pretty soon you’re talking about real money!”
  
-shouldn’t be drowned out+Do you think you could manage this money better? So do the staff, volunteers, and supporters of the Convention of States Project. We believe that the best decisions are made as close to home as possible, with local input and oversight. The challenges facing cities like Chicago and New York are far different from those in Antelope, South Dakota. The needs of an individual community, big or small, shouldn’t be drowned out in a one-size-fits-all “solution” crafted largely by people who have never even set foot in that neighbor-hood...or one in which waste, fraud, and abuse is an inherent part of the system.
  
-in a one-size-fits-all +At an Article V Convention to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government and establish spending controls and term limits upon its officials, the states have the power to propose a constitutional amendment that prohibits the federal government from spending money on projects and expenditures that the Constitution originally reserved for state and local control. They can also eliminate unfunded federal mandates.
- +
-“solution”. +
- +
-//Continued from front page// +
- +
-for buildings in rural West Virginia with fewer than 10 computers +
- +
-  - <sup>$</sup>104 million on a “Harbor to Nowhere”and “Airport to Nowhere” to go with Alaska’s “Bridge to Nowhere” +
-  - <sup>$</sup>2 million to fund a single intern for theDepartment of Agriculture +
-  - <sup>$</sup>862,000 a year to warehouse unusedfurniture for the IRS +
-  - <sup>$</sup>16 million a year on food stamps fordead people +
-These expenditures are easily hidden in the federal budget because it is so large and complicated. Together with the annotations, the federal budget is the size of a telephone directory for a large city. Unless they sit on an appropriations committee, members of Congress can +
- +
-only cast an up or down vote on a budget or spending bill in its entirety. Most of them can’t possibly read it all, and even if they did, they have no power to strike a single line item. And they cer-tainly aren’t going to bring the entire federal government to a halt over a little pork...especially if their state benefits. But as Sen. Everett Dirksen famously said, “A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you’re talking about real money!” +
- +
-Do you think you could manage this money better? So do the staff, volun-teers, and supporters of the Convention of States Project. We believe that the best decisions are made as close to home as possible, with local input and oversight. The challenges facing cities like Chicago and New York are far different from those in Antelope, South Dakota. The needs of an individual com- +
- +
-{{article_17-addressstatebudgetchallenges_Image_0.jpg}} +
- +
-munity, big or small, shouldn’t be drowned out in a one-size-fits-all “solu-tion” crafted largely by people who have never even set foot in that neighbor-hood...or one in which waste, fraud, and abuse is an inherent part of the system. +
- +
-At an Article V Convention to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government and establish spending con-trols and term limits upon its officials, the states have the power to propose a con-stitutional amendment that prohibits the federal government from spending money on projects and expenditures that the Constitution originally reserved for state and local control. They can also eliminate unfunded federal mandates.+
  
 And if you’re a legislator in a donor state, that’s very good news. And if you’re a legislator in a donor state, that’s very good news.
  
 +----
 +Sign the COS Petition, be a leader https://conventionofstates.com/take_action \\
 +Volunteer here https://conventionofstates.com/take_action/volunteer
  
- +||[[https://conventionofstates.com|{{ :cos-footer-logo.png |}}]] || 
-(540) 441-**7**22**7**|CONVENTIONOFSTATES.COM|Facebook.com/ConventionOfStates|Twitter.com/COSproject +(540)441-7227 | [[https://conventionofstates.com|CONVENTIONOFSTATES.COM]] | [[https://facebook.com/conventionofstates|Facebook.com/ConventionOfStates]] | [[https://twitter.com/cosproject|Twitter.com/COSproject]]| [[info@conventionofstates.com| Email us]]
- +
  
documents/cosproject/surge/article_17-addressstatebudgetchallenges.txt · Last modified: 2021/02/23 16:14 by 127.0.0.1