Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- documents:answers:external:indianalegislation [2015/10/31 22:23] – ↷ Page moved from authoring:cospwiki:answers:external:indianalegislation to documents:answers:external:indianalegislation Oliver Wolcott
+++ documents:external:indianalegislation [2015/11/01 22:08] – Oliver Wolcott
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Indiana Senate President Pro Tempore\\
 David Long\\
+[[http://www.indianasenaterepublicans.com/clientuploads/directory/publications/Sen David Long Article V Packet-Online.pdf|(Source)]]
 </WRAP>
@@ Line 87: / Line 88: @@
   * The journals of these conventions show that they all remained essentially within the scope of their calls.
-  * Contrary to common belief, the 1787 Philadelphia Constitutional Convention had very broad power to suggest a new form of government. It was not a [[authoring:cospwiki:answers:faq#is_a_convention_of_states_safe|runaway convention]].
+  * Contrary to common belief, the 1787 Philadelphia Constitutional Convention had very broad power to suggest a new form of government. It was not a [[documents:answers:faq#is_a_convention_of_states_safe|runaway convention]].
 ===== CONCLUSION: =====
@@ Line 121: / Line 122: @@
   * //Delegate Limitation: //Strictly limits the authority of Indiana's delegates to an Article V amendments convention. <BOOKMARK:runaway>Provisions guarding against a so-called **"runaway convention"** include:
     * Requires the Indiana General Assembly to adopt a binding resolution governing the rules of procedure for Indiana's delegates;
-    * Provides that a vote cast by a delegate or alternate that is outside the instructions established by the General Assembly or exceeds the [[authoring:cospwiki:answers:faq#can_an_article_v_convention_be_limited_to_a_single_subject|subject]] matter limits established by the General Assembly's resolution calling for the Article V convention is void.
+    * Provides that a vote cast by a delegate or alternate that is outside the instructions established by the General Assembly or exceeds the [[documents:answers:faq#can_an_article_v_convention_be_limited_to_a_single_subject|subject]] matter limits established by the General Assembly's resolution calling for the Article V convention is void.
     * Provides that a delegate or alternate who votes or attempts to vote outside the instructions established by the General Assembly or the subject matter limits established by the General Assembly's resolution calling for the Article V convention forfeits his/her appointment and is guilty of a Class D felony.
     * Makes clear that the General Assembly's application calling for the Article V convention ceases to be active and is rendered ineffective if all of the delegates and alternates vote or attempt to vote outside of the instructions established by the General Assembly or the subject matter limits established by the General Assembly's resolution calling for the Article V convention.