User Tools

Site Tools


documents:external:secondamendment2

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
documents:external:secondamendment2 [2018/03/26 10:36] Oliver Wolcottdocuments:external:secondamendment2 [2019/02/09 23:33] Oliver Wolcott
Line 3: Line 3:
 <WRAP round download 50%> <WRAP round download 50%>
 {{:documents:external:secondamendment2.pdf |Download:WHETHER THE SECOND AMENDMENT SECURES AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHT}} {{:documents:external:secondamendment2.pdf |Download:WHETHER THE SECOND AMENDMENT SECURES AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHT}}
-</WRAP> 
  
 +eBook Formats available {{ :ebook:whether_the_second_amendment_se_-_ashcroft_convention_of_states.pdf |[PDF]}}  {{ :ebook:whether_the_second_amendment_se_-_ashcroft_convention_of_states.epub |[ePub]}} {{ :ebook:whether_the_second_amendment_se_-_ashcroft_convention_of_states.mobi |[Mobi]}} 
 +</WRAP>
 +{{page>:socials}}
 **//The Second Amendment secures a right of individuals generally, not a right of States or a right restricted to persons serving in militias.//** \\  **//The Second Amendment secures a right of individuals generally, not a right of States or a right restricted to persons serving in militias.//** \\ 
 August 24, 2004 August 24, 2004
Line 351: Line 353:
  
 <blockquote> <blockquote>
-[I]t is certainly beyond human art and sophistry, to prove the British subjects, to whom the //privilege// of possessing arms is expressly recognized by the Bill of Rights, and, who live in a province where the law requires them to be equip'd with //arms//, &c. are guilty of an //illegal act//, in calling upon one another to be provided with them, as the //law directs//.((Boston Gazette, and Country Journal at 2, col. 1 (Jan. 30, 1769), //quoted in// Halbrook, //Right to Bear// at 6; //see Boston under Military Rule, 1768-1769, as Revealed in a Journal of the Times// 61 (Oliver Morton Dickerson ed., 1936) (reprinting same passage from Boston Evening Post (Apr. 3, 1769)).))  +[I]t is certainly beyond human art and sophistry, to prove the British subjects, to whom the //privilege// of possessing arms is expressly recognized by the Bill of Rights, and, who live in a province where the law requires them to be equip'd with //arms//, &c. are guilty of an //illegal act//, in calling upon one another to be provided with them, as the //law directs//.((Boston Gazette, and Country Journal at 2, col. 1 (Jan. 30, 1769), //quoted in// Halbrook, //Right to Bear// at 6; //see Boston under Military Rule, 1768-1769, as Revealed in a Journal of the Times// 61 (Oliver Morton Dickerson ed., 1936) (reprinting same passage from Boston Evening Post (Apr. 3, 1769) ).))  
 </blockquote> </blockquote>
  
documents/external/secondamendment2.txt · Last modified: 2021/02/23 16:14 by 127.0.0.1