Convention of States

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: index » historicaldocuments » fedpapers » federalist04
historicaldocuments:fedpapers:federalist04

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision		Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
historicaldocuments:fedpapers:federalist04 [2015/09/27 18:47] – created jmchenryhistoricaldocuments:fedpapers:federalist04 [2015/10/04 01:49] – jmchenry
Line 1: Line 1:
 +[[historicaldocuments:fedpapers:index.txt|Index to the Federalist Papers]]
 ====== FEDERALIST No. 4 ====== ====== FEDERALIST No. 4 ======
 To the People of the State of New York: To the People of the State of New York:
  
-MY LAST paper assigned several reasons why the safety of the people would be best secured by union against the danger it may be exposed to by JUST causes of war given to other nations; and those reasons show that such causes would not only be more rarely given, but would also be more easily accommodated, by a national government than either by the State governments or the proposed little confederacies.+MY LAST paper assigned several reasons why the safety of the people would be best secured by union against the danger it may be exposed to by **JUST** causes of war given to other nations; and those reasons show that such causes would not only be more rarely given, but would also be more easily accommodated, by a national government than either by the State governments or the proposed little confederacies.
  
-But the safety of the people of America against dangers from FOREIGN force depends not only on their forbearing to give JUST causes of war to other nations, but also on their placing and continuing themselves in such a situation as not to INVITE hostility or insult; for it need not be observed that there are PRETENDED as well as just causes of war.+But the safety of the people of America against dangers from **FOREIGN** force depends not only on their forbearing to give **JUST** causes of war to other nations, but also on their placing and continuing themselves in such a situation as not to **INVITE** hostility or insult; for it need not be observed that there are **PRETENDED** as well as just causes of war.
  
 It is too true, however disgraceful it may be to human nature, that nations in general will make war whenever they have a prospect of getting anything by it; nay, absolute monarchs will often make war when their nations are to get nothing by it, but for the purposes and objects merely personal, such as thirst for military glory, revenge for personal affronts, ambition, or private compacts to aggrandize or support their particular families or partisans. These and a variety of other motives, which affect only the mind of the sovereign, often lead him to engage in wars not sanctified by justice or the voice and interests of his people. But, independent of these inducements to war, which are more prevalent in absolute monarchies, but which well deserve our attention, there are others which affect nations as often as kings; and some of them will on examination be found to grow out of our relative situation and circumstances. It is too true, however disgraceful it may be to human nature, that nations in general will make war whenever they have a prospect of getting anything by it; nay, absolute monarchs will often make war when their nations are to get nothing by it, but for the purposes and objects merely personal, such as thirst for military glory, revenge for personal affronts, ambition, or private compacts to aggrandize or support their particular families or partisans. These and a variety of other motives, which affect only the mind of the sovereign, often lead him to engage in wars not sanctified by justice or the voice and interests of his people. But, independent of these inducements to war, which are more prevalent in absolute monarchies, but which well deserve our attention, there are others which affect nations as often as kings; and some of them will on examination be found to grow out of our relative situation and circumstances.
Line 20: Line 21:
 From these and such like considerations, which might, if consistent with prudence, be more amplified and detailed, it is easy to see that jealousies and uneasinesses may gradually slide into the minds and cabinets of other nations, and that we are not to expect that they should regard our advancement in union, in power and consequence by land and by sea, with an eye of indifference and composure. From these and such like considerations, which might, if consistent with prudence, be more amplified and detailed, it is easy to see that jealousies and uneasinesses may gradually slide into the minds and cabinets of other nations, and that we are not to expect that they should regard our advancement in union, in power and consequence by land and by sea, with an eye of indifference and composure.
  
-The people of America are aware that inducements to war may arise out of these circumstances, as well as from others not so obvious at present, and that whenever such inducements may find fit time and opportunity for operation, pretenses to color and justify them will not be wanting. Wisely, therefore, do they consider union and a good national government as necessary to put and keep them in SUCH A SITUATION as, instead of INVITING war, will tend to repress and discourage it. That situation consists in the best possible state of defense, and necessarily depends on the government, the arms, and the resources of the country.+The people of America are aware that inducements to war may arise out of these circumstances, as well as from others not so obvious at present, and that whenever such inducements may find fit time and opportunity for operation, pretenses to color and justify them will not be wanting. Wisely, therefore, do they consider union and a good national government as necessary to put and keep them in **SUCH A SITUATION** as, instead of **INVITING** war, will tend to repress and discourage it. That situation consists in the best possible state of defense, and necessarily depends on the government, the arms, and the resources of the country.
  
 As the safety of the whole is the interest of the whole, and cannot be provided for without government, either one or more or many, let us inquire whether one good government is not, relative to the object in question, more competent than any other given number whatever. As the safety of the whole is the interest of the whole, and cannot be provided for without government, either one or more or many, let us inquire whether one good government is not, relative to the object in question, more competent than any other given number whatever.
Line 38: Line 39:
 PUBLIUS.  PUBLIUS. 
  
-[[historicaldocuments:fedpapers:federalist03|<<Previous]] | [[historicaldocuments:fedpapers:federalist05| Next >>]]+[[historicaldocuments:anti-federalist:antifed04| The Anti-Federalist Response ]] \\ 
 +[[historicaldocuments:fedpapers:federalist03| << Previous Federalist Paper]] | [[historicaldocuments:fedpapers:federalist05| Next Federalist Paper >>]]
  
 [[historicaldocuments:fedpapers:index.txt|Index]] [[historicaldocuments:fedpapers:index.txt|Index]]
historicaldocuments/fedpapers/federalist04.txt · Last modified: 2021/02/23 16:15 by 127.0.0.1