User Tools

Site Tools


documents:answers:short_answers

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
authoring:cospwiki:answers:short_answers [2015/10/30 21:30] – ↷ Page moved from authoring:cospwiki:short_answers to authoring:cospwiki:answers:short_answers Oliver Wolcottdocuments:answers:short_answers [2015/10/31 22:23] – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation Oliver Wolcott
Line 23: Line 23:
 =====4. Are you sure the Article V convention process is safe?===== =====4. Are you sure the Article V convention process is safe?=====
  
-Yes. Despite a [[authoring:cospwiki:answers:liberal-articlev-disinfo|common myth]] that was promoted by liberal groups beginning in the 1960's, there is absolutely no precedent for a "runaway convention." And there are redundant protections against ultra vires amendment proposals:+Yes. Despite a [[documents:answers:liberal-articlev-disinfo|common myth]] that was promoted by liberal groups beginning in the 1960's, there is absolutely no precedent for a "runaway convention." And there are redundant protections against ultra vires amendment proposals:
  
   *The scope of authority for the convention is defined by the topic specified in the 34 applications that trigger the convention. Any proposals beyond that scope would be out of order.    *The scope of authority for the convention is defined by the topic specified in the 34 applications that trigger the convention. Any proposals beyond that scope would be out of order. 
documents/answers/short_answers.txt · Last modified: 2022/01/01 13:22 by Oliver Wolcott