User Tools

Site Tools


documents:answers:two_reasons_one_state_vote

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
documents:answers:two_reasons_one_state_vote [2015/11/01 10:35] – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation Oliver Wolcottdocuments:answers:two_reasons_one_state_vote [2015/11/30 20:07] Oliver Wolcott
Line 7: Line 7:
 February 6, 2015 by [[http://constitution.i2i.org/author/robnatelson/|Rob Natelson]] February 6, 2015 by [[http://constitution.i2i.org/author/robnatelson/|Rob Natelson]]
 [[http://constitution.i2i.org/2015/02/06/trying-to-abolishing-the-convention’s-one-stateone-vote-rule-not-only-would-be-unconstitutional—it-wouldn’t-be-worth-trying/|(Source)]] [[http://constitution.i2i.org/2015/02/06/trying-to-abolishing-the-convention’s-one-stateone-vote-rule-not-only-would-be-unconstitutional—it-wouldn’t-be-worth-trying/|(Source)]]
 +{{tag>application amendments Natelson Necessary_and_Proper_clause One_vote Delegate who_dominates}}
      
  
Line 39: Line 40:
 [[http://constitution.i2i.org/2015/02/06/trying-to-abolishing-the-convention’s-one-stateone-vote-rule-not-only-would-be-unconstitutional—it-wouldn’t-be-worth-trying/|Source]]  [[http://constitution.i2i.org/2015/02/06/trying-to-abolishing-the-convention’s-one-stateone-vote-rule-not-only-would-be-unconstitutional—it-wouldn’t-be-worth-trying/|Source]] 
  
-{{tag>application amendments Natelson Necessary_and_Proper One_vote Delegate who_dominates}} 
  
  
  
documents/answers/two_reasons_one_state_vote.txt · Last modified: 2021/02/23 16:14 by 127.0.0.1