User Tools

Site Tools


documents:answers:two_reasons_one_state_vote

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
documents:answers:two_reasons_one_state_vote [2015/11/01 10:35] – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation Oliver Wolcottdocuments:answers:two_reasons_one_state_vote [2016/02/01 23:39] Oliver Wolcott
Line 7: Line 7:
 February 6, 2015 by [[http://constitution.i2i.org/author/robnatelson/|Rob Natelson]] February 6, 2015 by [[http://constitution.i2i.org/author/robnatelson/|Rob Natelson]]
 [[http://constitution.i2i.org/2015/02/06/trying-to-abolishing-the-convention’s-one-stateone-vote-rule-not-only-would-be-unconstitutional—it-wouldn’t-be-worth-trying/|(Source)]] [[http://constitution.i2i.org/2015/02/06/trying-to-abolishing-the-convention’s-one-stateone-vote-rule-not-only-would-be-unconstitutional—it-wouldn’t-be-worth-trying/|(Source)]]
 +{{tag>application amendments Natelson Necessary_and_Proper_clause Article_1_Section_8_Clause_18 One_vote Delegate who_dominates}}
      
  
Line 39: Line 40:
 [[http://constitution.i2i.org/2015/02/06/trying-to-abolishing-the-convention’s-one-stateone-vote-rule-not-only-would-be-unconstitutional—it-wouldn’t-be-worth-trying/|Source]]  [[http://constitution.i2i.org/2015/02/06/trying-to-abolishing-the-convention’s-one-stateone-vote-rule-not-only-would-be-unconstitutional—it-wouldn’t-be-worth-trying/|Source]] 
  
-{{tag>application amendments Natelson Necessary_and_Proper One_vote Delegate who_dominates}} 
  
  
  
documents/answers/two_reasons_one_state_vote.txt · Last modified: 2021/02/23 16:14 by 127.0.0.1