User Tools

Site Tools


documents:cosproject:surge:article_18-demystifyingdustytool

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
documents:cosproject:surge:article_18-demystifyingdustytool [2018/03/23 22:12] Oliver Wolcottdocuments:cosproject:surge:article_18-demystifyingdustytool [2018/03/25 13:35] Oliver Wolcott
Line 4: Line 4:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 {{tag>surge}} {{tag>surge}}
-{{article_18-demystifyingdustytool_Image_0.png}} +{{:documents:cosproject:surge:surge-18-1.png?800|It’s time to dust off the tool the Founders gave us in Article V.}} 
-<blockquote> +----
-It’s time to dust off the tool the Founders gave us in Article V. +
-</blockquote>+
 ===== The Article V Solution — Demystifying a Dusty Tool ===== ===== The Article V Solution — Demystifying a Dusty Tool =====
 **Rita Dunaway, Esq., National Legislative Strategist for the Convention of States Project** **Rita Dunaway, Esq., National Legislative Strategist for the Convention of States Project**
Line 25: Line 23:
 The result was the //unanimous// adoption of Article V in its current form, providing two ways for constitutional amendments to be proposed: Congress can propose them, or the states can propose amendments at a convention called by Congress upon application from two-thirds, or 34, of the states. Regardless of which body proposes the amendments, proposals must be ratified by three-fourths, or 38, of the states in order to become effective. The result was the //unanimous// adoption of Article V in its current form, providing two ways for constitutional amendments to be proposed: Congress can propose them, or the states can propose amendments at a convention called by Congress upon application from two-thirds, or 34, of the states. Regardless of which body proposes the amendments, proposals must be ratified by three-fourths, or 38, of the states in order to become effective.
  
-{{article_18-demystifyingdustytool_Image_2.png}} +{{:documents:cosproject:surge:surge-18-2.png?800|The “unanswerable” questions about Article V do have answers.}} 
-<blockquote> +----
-The “unanswerable” questions about Article V do have answers. +
-</blockquote> +
 We also know from history that voting at an Article V convention would be done on a one-state, one-vote basis. This is the universal precedent set by the 32 inter-state conventions that occurred prior to the Constitution’s drafting. It explains why it was unnecessary for Article V to specify the number of delegates to be sent by each state; the states can send as many delegates as they like, but each state only gets one vote. We also know from history that voting at an Article V convention would be done on a one-state, one-vote basis. This is the universal precedent set by the 32 inter-state conventions that occurred prior to the Constitution’s drafting. It explains why it was unnecessary for Article V to specify the number of delegates to be sent by each state; the states can send as many delegates as they like, but each state only gets one vote.
  
documents/cosproject/surge/article_18-demystifyingdustytool.txt · Last modified: 2021/02/23 16:14 by 127.0.0.1