documents:cosproject:surge:article_2-lampofexperience
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| documents:cosproject:surge:article_2-lampofexperience [2018/03/25 11:54] – Oliver Wolcott | documents:cosproject:surge:article_2-lampofexperience [2018/03/25 11:55] – Oliver Wolcott | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| The founding generation employed it for this purpose just seven years after the Constitution came into effect. In //Chisholm v. Georgia//, the Supreme Court misinterpreted the wording of Article III defining the jurisdiction of the federal courts. The Eleventh Amendment reversed that decision. | The founding generation employed it for this purpose just seven years after the Constitution came into effect. In //Chisholm v. Georgia//, the Supreme Court misinterpreted the wording of Article III defining the jurisdiction of the federal courts. The Eleventh Amendment reversed that decision. | ||
| - | {{: | + | {{: |
| - | < | + | |
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Women’s Suffrage envoys on and about the East Steps of the Capitol, May 9, 1914. The Nineteenth Amendment was ratified August 18, 1920.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| In 1857, the Court issued //Dred Scott v. Sandford//, in which it erroneously interpreted the Constitution to deny citizenship to African Americans. The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment reversed that case. | In 1857, the Court issued //Dred Scott v. Sandford//, in which it erroneously interpreted the Constitution to deny citizenship to African Americans. The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment reversed that case. | ||
documents/cosproject/surge/article_2-lampofexperience.txt · Last modified: 2021/02/23 16:14 by 127.0.0.1