User Tools

Site Tools


documents:cosproject:surge:article_2-lampofexperience

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
documents:cosproject:surge:article_2-lampofexperience [2018/03/25 11:55] Oliver Wolcottdocuments:cosproject:surge:article_2-lampofexperience [2021/02/23 16:14] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 6: Line 6:
 {{tag>surge}} {{tag>surge}}
 {{:documents:cosproject:surge:surge-2-1.png?800|Amendments work. In fact, amendments have had a major impact on American political life, mostly for good.}} {{:documents:cosproject:surge:surge-2-1.png?800|Amendments work. In fact, amendments have had a major impact on American political life, mostly for good.}}
- 
 ---- ----
- 
-//Amendments work. \\ 
-In fact, amendments have had a major impact on American political life, mostly for good.// 
- 
----- 
- 
- 
 ===== The Lamp of Experience: Constitutional Amendments Work ===== ===== The Lamp of Experience: Constitutional Amendments Work =====
 **Robert Natelson, Independence Institute’s Senior Fellow in Constitutional Jurisprudence and Head of the Institute’s Article V Information Center** **Robert Natelson, Independence Institute’s Senior Fellow in Constitutional Jurisprudence and Head of the Institute’s Article V Information Center**
Line 48: Line 40:
  
 {{:documents:cosproject:surge:surge-2-2.png?800|Women’s Suffrage envoys on and about the East Steps of the Capitol, May 9, 1914. The Nineteenth Amendment was ratified August 18, 1920.}} {{:documents:cosproject:surge:surge-2-2.png?800|Women’s Suffrage envoys on and about the East Steps of the Capitol, May 9, 1914. The Nineteenth Amendment was ratified August 18, 1920.}}
- 
 ---- ----
- 
-//Women’s Suffrage envoys on and about the East Steps of the Capitol, May 9, 1914. The Nineteenth Amendment was ratified August 18, 1920.// 
- 
----- 
- 
  
 In 1857, the Court issued //Dred Scott v. Sandford//, in which it erroneously interpreted the Constitution to deny citizenship to African Americans. The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment reversed that case. In 1857, the Court issued //Dred Scott v. Sandford//, in which it erroneously interpreted the Constitution to deny citizenship to African Americans. The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment reversed that case.
Line 82: Line 68:
 In this case, the lamp of experience sheds light unmistakably bright and clear: Constitutional amendments work. In this case, the lamp of experience sheds light unmistakably bright and clear: Constitutional amendments work.
 ---- ----
-Sign the COS Petition, be a leader https://conventionofstates.com/take_action \\ +{{page>:wiki_footer}}
-Volunteer here https://conventionofstates.com/take_action/volunteer +
- +
-||[[https://conventionofstates.com|{{ :cos-footer-logo.png |}}]] || +
-(540)441-7227 | [[https://conventionofstates.com|CONVENTIONOFSTATES.COM]] | [[https://facebook.com/conventionofstates|Facebook.com/ConventionOfStates]] | [[https://twitter.com/cosproject|Twitter.com/COSproject]]| [[info@conventionofstates.com| Email us]]+
  
documents/cosproject/surge/article_2-lampofexperience.txt · Last modified: 2021/02/23 16:14 by 127.0.0.1