documents:cosproject:surge:article_6-howthecourts
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| documents:cosproject:surge:article_6-howthecourts [2018/03/24 17:03] – Oliver Wolcott | documents:cosproject:surge:article_6-howthecourts [2018/03/25 09:16] – Oliver Wolcott | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| {{tag> | {{tag> | ||
| - | {{article_6-howthecourts_Image_0.png}} | + | {{: |
| < | < | ||
| One source of security we have... is the courts’ long history of protecting the integrity of the [amendment] procedure. | One source of security we have... is the courts’ long history of protecting the integrity of the [amendment] procedure. | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| * The two - thirds vote required in Congress for proposing amendments is two thirds of a quorum present and voting, not of the entire membership. //State of Rhode Island v. Palmer//, 253 U.S. 320 (1920). | * The two - thirds vote required in Congress for proposing amendments is two thirds of a quorum present and voting, not of the entire membership. //State of Rhode Island v. Palmer//, 253 U.S. 320 (1920). | ||
| - | {{article_6-howthecourts_Image_2.png}} | + | {{: |
| < | < | ||
| The courts are very much in the business of protecting Article V procedures, and they have done so for more than two centuries. | The courts are very much in the business of protecting Article V procedures, and they have done so for more than two centuries. | ||
documents/cosproject/surge/article_6-howthecourts.txt · Last modified: 2021/02/23 16:14 by 127.0.0.1