Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- documents:cosproject:surge:article_16-implementtenthamendment [2018/03/23 22:36] – Oliver Wolcott
+++ documents:cosproject:surge:article_16-implementtenthamendment [2018/03/25 13:33] – Oliver Wolcott
@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 </WRAP>
 {{tag>surge}}
-{{article_16-implementtenthamendment_Image_0.png}}
+{{:documents:cosproject:surge:surge-16-1.png?800|Article V is the ultimate nullification procedure.}}
-<blockquote>
+----
-Article V is the ultimate nullification procedure.
-</blockquote>
 ===== The Article V Solution — The Way to Implement the Tenth Amendment =====
 **Rita Dunaway, Esq., National Legislative Strategist for the Convention of States Project**
@@ Line 31: / Line 29: @@
 Secondly, how can a state enforce its nullification of a federal law? For instance, if a state decides that the Affordable Care Act’s individual man-date is unconstitutional, how can it protect its citizens against the “tax” that will be levied against them if they fail to comply? It’s difficult to envision an effective nullification enforcement method that doesn’t end, at some point, with armed conflict.
-{{article_16-implementtenthamendment_Image_2.png}}
+{{:documents:cosproject:surge:surge-16-2.png?600|The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people}}
-<blockquote>
+----
-The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
-</blockquote>
 But for true conservatives whose goal is to conserve the original design of our federal system, the far more fundamental problem with this type of in-your-face nullification is the fact that it was not the Founders’ plan.